Securities Law

Ontario Securities Class Action Guide 2024

Secondary market liability under OSA s.138.3, the leave requirement, Capital Markets Tribunal and OSC enforcement, insider trading and market manipulation, and class action certification and settlement for Ontario securities and class action lawyers.

December 202414 min readSecurities Law

Ontario Securities Law Framework

Ontario is Canada's largest capital market. The Securities Act (Ontario) (RSO 1990, c S.5) is administered by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC), which was renamed the Capital Markets Authority in some contexts after the 2022 legislative amendments creating the Capital Markets Act framework. The OSC administers the Securities Act, the Commodity Futures Act, and the Business Corporations Act (securities provisions).

The Capital Markets Tribunal (CMT) — formerly the Ontario Securities Commission hearing panel — is the adjudicative arm of the OSC. It hears enforcement proceedings, registration matters, and other securities law adjudications.

2022 Capital Markets Act amendments: Bill 213 (Better for Consumers and Businesses Act, 2022) separated the OSC's adjudicative functions (now the Capital Markets Tribunal) from its regulatory and enforcement functions (OSC Staff/Commission). This structural separation mirrors the federal model for securities regulators.

Secondary Market Liability: OSA Part XXIII.1

Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act (ss.138.1-138.14) creates statutory civil liability for secondary market misrepresentations. This allows investors to recover losses caused by material misrepresentations in a reporting issuer's public disclosure documents or oral statements by authorized persons.

Key feature: Unlike common law fraud or negligent misrepresentation, s.138.3 does not require individual plaintiffs to prove actual reliance on the misrepresentation. The plaintiff need only establish the misrepresentation and their loss — reliance is presumed from the "fraud on the market" theory. This makes s.138.3 claims well-suited to class actions.

Defendants and Defences under s.138.3

Reporting issuer

Liability: Strict liability for misrepresentation in continuous disclosure documents (AIF, MD&A, financial statements, material change reports, press releases)
Defences: Reasonable investigation; correction within time; plaintiff knew of misrepresentation

Director or officer

Liability: Liability for misrepresentation in issuer disclosure documents and public oral statements made with the issuer's authority
Defences: Reasonable investigation; no knowledge of misrepresentation; correction

Influential person (control person, insider)

Liability: Liability for misrepresentation in documents or oral statements made with or without issuer authority where influential person had influence
Defences: Did not know and should not have known of misrepresentation; reasonable investigation

Expert (auditor, lawyer providing opinion)

Liability: Liability for misrepresentation in any part of a disclosure document attributed to the expert's consent
Defences: Reasonable investigation; no consent to use of expert report in the way it was used; correction

Leave Requirement (OSA s.138.8)

A plaintiff must obtain leave of the court before commencing a s.138.3 action. The leave test requires: (1) the action is brought in good faith; and (2) there is a reasonable possibility that the action will be resolved at trial in the plaintiff's favour. The "reasonable possibility" standard is lower than a balance of probabilities — it requires a plausible claim, not a probable one. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed this standard in IMAX Corp v Silver, 2021 SCC 62.

Insider Trading and Market Manipulation

Insider Trading (OSA ss.76-77)

  • Insider means: director, officer, 10% shareholder, person in a special relationship with the issuer (includes tippees and those who received the information)
  • Prohibited: trading in securities of a reporting issuer while in possession of material undisclosed information (MNPI)
  • Also prohibited: tipping — informing another person of MNPI where the insider knows or should know the tippee will trade
  • Civil liability: OSA s.134 — person who traded against the insider must be compensated; insider disgorges profits; limitation: earlier of 2 years after discovery or 6 years after the trade
  • Criminal: Criminal Code s.382.1 — insider trading; up to 10 years imprisonment

Market Manipulation (OSA s.126.1)

  • Prohibited: acts, practices, or courses of conduct that create a misleading appearance of trading activity or artificial price
  • Wash trading, matched orders, spoofing, layering, and pump-and-dump schemes are forms of market manipulation
  • OSC enforcement: administrative penalties, disgorgement, registration suspension
  • Criminal Code s.380 (fraud) may also apply to market manipulation schemes
  • Civil liability: s.138.3 and common law fraud claims may overlap with manipulation claims

OSC / Capital Markets Tribunal Enforcement Process

1

1. Investigation

OSC Staff investigate potential breaches; subpoenas for documents and evidence; examination under oath of witnesses; coordination with RCMP (capital markets investigations team) for criminal referrals

2

2. Voluntary Surrender / Settlement Negotiations

Many OSC matters resolved through negotiated settlement before hearing; respondent may negotiate sanctions with OSC Staff; approved by Capital Markets Tribunal

3

3. Statement of Allegations

OSC Staff file Statement of Allegations (SOA) setting out alleged breaches; respondent may request a hearing; case management proceedings

4

4. Merits Hearing

Evidentiary hearing before Capital Markets Tribunal panel; OSC Staff presents case; respondent may call evidence and cross-examine; Tribunal issues findings

5

5. Sanctions Hearing

If breach found, separate sanctions hearing; OSC Staff proposes sanctions; respondent submits on mitigating factors; Tribunal issues sanctions order

6

6. Appeals

Appeals from Capital Markets Tribunal to Divisional Court on questions of law or jurisdiction; further appeals to Court of Appeal with leave

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the leave requirement for a securities class action in Ontario?

Under s.138.8 of the Ontario Securities Act, a plaintiff must obtain leave of the court before commencing a class action for secondary market misrepresentation under s.138.3. The plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) the action is being brought in good faith; and (2) there is a reasonable possibility that the action will be resolved at trial in favour of the plaintiff. The leave test is a 'reasonable possibility' standard — lower than a balance of probabilities.

What is secondary market liability under the Ontario Securities Act?

Secondary market liability under Part XXIII.1 of the Ontario Securities Act (ss.138.1-138.14) allows investors who purchased or sold securities on the secondary market to sue reporting issuers, directors, officers, and influential persons for misrepresentation in public disclosure documents or public oral statements. Unlike common law fraud, s.138.3 does not require proof of reliance — the plaintiff need only show a misrepresentation and their loss.

What enforcement powers does the Ontario Securities Commission have?

The OSC has broad enforcement powers: administrative hearings before the Capital Markets Tribunal; cease-trading orders; suspension or revocation of registrations; disgorgement of profits; administrative penalties up to $15 million per failure to comply; and third-party bans. The OSC can also refer matters to the Attorney General for criminal prosecution.

How are Ontario securities class actions certified and approved for settlement?

Ontario securities class actions proceed under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992. Certification requires: an identifiable class; a common issues question; class proceedings as the preferable procedure; a workable plan; and a suitable representative plaintiff. Settlements must be approved by the court — the court considers whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of class members. Notice to class members and a fairness hearing are required before approval.

Manage Your Securities Law Practice with Atticus

Track limitation periods, manage trust accounting, and organize securities law files with Atticus — built for Ontario solo and small law firms.

Start Free Trial

Related Ontario Law Guides